Star trek : Into darkness – This movie is a sequel to the
Star Trek (2009). The 2009 movie is the reboot of the Star trek franchise in
silver screen which was considered to be dead (Appadi thaan en kitta
sonnainga). The reboot gave a new hope to the trekkies and the teaser and
poster increased the hope exponentially. You might find the above lines in any
review of this movie. I am not a trekkie (and I call myself a movie buff),
never seen a series, a movie. My first Star trek movie was the 2009 movie that
too for Simon Pegg (I am able to sense the facepalm of the readers). The movie
was fun, I had no prior or post knowledge about the franchise. Later after
hearing about the sequel announcement of the movie I was excited for two
reasons, the second reason being the same cast, crew and the first being the
name “Benedict Cumberbatch”. First there was a speculation that he is playing
Khan, then official announcement came that he is playing John Harrison and
neither name I am aware of. Still the thing which excited me is Cumberbatch
playing the Lead antagonist and he has a significant, prominent, eminent and
blah blab blah role. The posters were revealed and in all of it had
Cumberbatch. Many posters had only Cumberbatch. The movie was taken away from trekkies and
Cumberbatchers like me took hold of the movie and expected a lot. Even they
advertised it to be a standalone movie so that no condition that you should be
a trekkie to enjoy it. it was great encouragement for Cumberbatchers.
I got tickets for the movie on the second weekend as exams
were there during the opening week (Naan Padikkura Paiyyan). The movie started
with same template as in 2009 movie and even went on for a while like the same
and now they show the glimpse of Cumberbatch and I tried to whistle but you
know PVR cinemas, they throw out if you whistle and I don’t want to waste 120
in that way. The movie was fast paced, regular witty dialogues of Kirk, spock,
scotty, bones. And now they give big build up to Cumberbatch, and then Kirk
goes to Klingon planet. Cumberbatch fights and surrenders and in a scene he
acts (that’s impressive truly) and then action scenes. Then the final fight,
few action scenes and a fight. The movie is finished like whoompf. So what did I
watched?
I felt like I was promised a Magnum and was given a choco bar. It may look like both are the same, but only the people who tasted the both can understand the difference. To add fuel to the fire the tweet by Anurag Kashyap saying, “Benedict Cumberbatch… The wrath of Khan”. Hollywood have the power to change the actor into a star. They have succeeded in that Cumberbatch’s case. Now it’s his turn to bring out the actor back. I am hoping for the actor to return in Fifth estate and as a Sherlock once again. I didn’t complain that the movie was bad, but not what I expected not what they told. It is different and nice too but not what I asked for, so should I be satisfied?
Cumberbatchers - Sounds ... weird! :P Nice post.
ReplyDelete